KHANAQIN, Iraq – The Khanaqin Qara Tapa Gulala separation proposal has drawn firm opposition from KDP Branch 15, which described the move as unconstitutional and demanded its immediate annulment.
On Tuesday, KDP Branch 15 in Khanaqin formally rejected the decision to separate Qara Tapa and Gulala from Khanaqin District. The branch called on the provincial council to reverse what it described as an unlawful measure.
In an official statement, the branch argued that the decision violates Article 140 of the Iraqi Constitution. The party emphasized that Article 140 outlines a specific legal framework for resolving administrative and territorial disputes in disputed areas. Therefore, it insisted that any unilateral administrative change contradicts constitutional procedures.
KDP officials stressed that the Khanaqin Qara Tapa Gulala separation undermines legal and political processes designed to address disputed territories. They warned that bypassing constitutional mechanisms could deepen tensions and complicate long-standing issues.
Furthermore, the branch stated that administrative restructuring must follow constitutional pathways and national consensus. It rejected any decision that disregards legal obligations or alters district boundaries without due process.
KDP Branch 15 urged relevant authorities to respect constitutional provisions and avoid politically motivated actions. It emphasized that sustainable solutions require dialogue and adherence to Iraq’s legal framework.
The statement also reaffirmed the party’s commitment to protecting the rights of residents in Khanaqin and surrounding areas. Officials argued that stability depends on respecting constitutional guarantees and preventing unilateral decisions.
The Khanaqin Qara Tapa Gulala separation debate comes amid broader discussions over disputed territories and governance structures in Iraq. Political actors continue to debate the implementation of Article 140 and related mechanisms.
In conclusion, KDP Branch 15 called for the immediate cancellation of the provincial council’s decision. The party reiterated that constitutional adherence remains essential to resolving territorial disputes and maintaining political stability.